The following messages will include a brutally, almost offensively honest truckload of truth.
------------
Guys = cannot objectify women
Girls = Can talk about all the dirty things they want to do to David Beckham.
HOORAY FOR DOUBLE STANDARDSSS#($*(*&%#(#%&!!!!
You know why females are trained to look nice? Because evolutionary it gets you a mate. That's the way it has been for countless years and continues to be a factor today. But how DARE guys find some females attractive! THEY MUST BE PIGS! That must mean you have sex with pigs then. Ew. So you walk out the door after putting up makeup and wearing those really hot short shorts for what? You come home to meet your loved one... in sweatpants. Face it. You want to look pretty. Consciously or not, you do it because you want the attention.
We live in an age, folks, where women wear shorter shorts than all the shorts made in history of mankind. Females are wearing tons of cleavage, and some of them are saying that it should have absolutely NO effect on anyone. That is quite retarded. God DAMN the guy that faps to a picture of a girl looking coyly at the camera with a truckload of cleavage on display! YOU ARE BEING A HYPOCRITE, SISTER.
In ye' olden days of the caveman and cavewoman, having a sub-par man rape a female is disaster; the female risks death... all for a man that has sub-par genes and may ditch her. This is why females subconsciously are wary of sub-par men giving sexual attention to them. But in order to attract the ideal man, she needs to look beautiful. It was the men that risked their lives to prove their awesomeness, and after that, having women like him is a good thing. Although, contrary to popular belief, we live in 2012 now. You're not really going to die if you have a baby. If a man makes sexually-suggestive comments, the guy is will be cited.
So back to the girl living in 2012 that wears the hot clothing outside. The girl wants the attention. Then they rationalize their wariness by saying men objectify women and are horrible. You know what, guys are human beings to. It's just, many of us are cool with it. So once again to the group of 'feminists' saying men have it all, YOU. SUCK. BALLS.
EVERYBODY JUDGES PEOPLE. EVERYBODY. If I wear the shitty shoes and the not-so-cool shirts and I have a pizza-face type of acne over, trust me, girls, you'd subconsciously (or even consciously, that's fine too) decide you don't really want to get to know me. They say a female judges a man based on the shoes that he wears. That sounds superficial. Because it is. In the cave-dwelling ages, you think the guys and girls have time to chat and socialize with every female and male to figure out which one had the best collective personality? NO, man. NO. A guy sees a very cute looking girl, and is intrigued and walks over to get to know her. THAT'S how it works.
You know why females earn less than males? Because the studies account for average wages. Men are wired to tolerate more risk. This means more fail like idiots trying to start a business, and a select few actually succeed. THAT'S WHY. Nobody is discriminating you. Hell, I know a few guys that WORSHIP females. Women that have no children have higher wages than men. Having a child is YOUR CHOICE, unless you were raped. Unless the average working-female who has a child got raped, something is clearly wrong here. Some feminists are all for 'independence from men and having to have children'. Well, guess what? Given time, a lot of you WANT men, a lot of you WANT children. Way to fight for nothing. Men are statistically more likely to take more risks, meaning more possible gain; they also statistically accept working further from home, more dangerous jobs, etc. (The dangerous jobs going back to risk tolerating.) THAT is why men make more money.
The feminists arguing and bickering and bitching over how UNFAIR life is are really the bane of society. How are we going to move forward with this crap?
...But you know what? MEN like WOMEN. MEN are sexually attracted to WOMEN. WOMEN like MEN. WOMEN are sexually attracted to MEN. (Not counting gays)
It's a funny thing, really. The video shows a tale of two female businesswomen in their 50's. They remember when they visited Italy the men were all coo-coo for them, and they were pissed off. Come age 50, they go back, they are STILL pissed. Because men didn't give two hoots about them.
I'd make my day if you watch the video. It's highly educational, but most importantly, it is a HOLY-MOTHER-OF-GOD-SHINING-BEACON-OF-TRUTH.
"Later on he goes on to explain why humans are willing to spend real-world money on virtual items: they pay to win, whether it's a payment in time or in currency. Some people are "rich" in time where others are "rich" in currency. Anyone who spends more time will also have the skills to back it up, but anyone paying for gear -- which is heavily tied to the hero's abilities -- is
seemingly no different than a golfer purchasing a nice set of clubs.
"A thousand dollars for a good set of golf clubs gives you the ability to play the game of golf better than someone of equal skill playing with a $10 garage sale set," he writes. "It doesn't automatically make you good, but it helps you get there. And if you love that game, then by all means play your best."
"What people don't realize is that currencies are only a numerical representation of value," he adds. "As soon as there is a collective demand for goods, both virtual and 'real' value is created. Humans developed currencies to represent this value in a tangible way, and to make the exchange of these goods more liquid. When there is collective demand from real people for an item within a game market, the same value is created as anything else in the world, and you can put a number on it. That number can be different depending on the currency you are using to represent the value.""
OMG NO ERIC BUT I'D NEVER SPEND CASH ON A FUCKING GAME! Bro. If time is money, you've just spent your bank's worth. Can I say life is time? You're spending your life grinding away, not having fun in the game to win.
Please don't judge people so quickly.
Side note and slightly related:
For those of you that look down upon those that spend time and effort to look well: I consider it as something that must be worked at to be achieved. Just like studying makes a good student, working out and eating right makes a better looking person. They have different priorities, that's all. Don't look down at every person that doesn't go to college; how is the world going to function if everybody went to Harvard? They just have DIFFERENT PRIORITIES. And that's fine. That's their life.
Whether you like it or not, you ARE influenced by society. Society tells you showering once a day is desirable. Society tells you eating this is good, eating that is disgusting. In other parts of the world, having eggs for breakfast is as disgusting as it gets. Numerous psychological studies back this up; you ARE influenced by society. Don't try to be a "rebel" by saying you don't conform at all, whatsoever, because that makes you a liar. Society tells you what to wear, how to act. In most cases, that's a GOOD thing. Where do you think your standards come from? It's passed down. I call it learning.
Why are people so scared of me referring them on Facebook about Runescape? Is the act of playing this video game and not that so shameful? On a similar note, I wouldn't feel any shame if I believed in this religion and not that. Back when I played Runescape, I have no problem telling people I do. People who will judge me and dislike me because of a game I play to waste time are people I don't want to spend time to talk to, anyways. Who the fuck are you to tell me what is acceptable and not acceptable to do in my spare time, anyways?
So, let's all use our heads and think about this before we discriminate somebody for playing Runescape the next time. This is really, really sad.
Apple is suing Samsung because the shape of their phones are rectangles. Tell me what is wrong with that picture. Apple also patented the shape of a wedge-shaped laptop. Maybe Apple should sue all? Apple doesn't invent anything ground up, Apple takes ideas others used and make it better, then patent the living crap from it. (Then charges you a funny price for it, if we're talking about Macs). Apple makes big margins, so why are they doing frivolous lawsuits and stifling competition by suing people over rectangles? When companies have a conflict, they work together to get problems resolved, for the sake of the industry, to new products can be made to raise the level of technology. One company has failed to do this over and over again, starting lawsuits. And that is Apple. UPDATE: Apple wins, then wants to sue Samsung for THREE BILLION dollars. In response to backlash, Samsung recorded the strongest sale so far.
Moral of the story: RECTANGLES ARE EVIL AND IF YOU MAKE THEM YOU SHALL BE PUNISHED!!!
Today I was walking to a college. Both a girl and I happened to walk through a door. Since she was closer, I waited for her to open the door. She stood at the door, looked at me, and I just looked at her. Then, she asked me if I was going to open the door for her, since it's the gentleman thing to do.
Jesus Christ, what are you, 5? You don't know how to open doors? Why are you asking me? You're closer, you open the door. So I said, "You were closer, so you should open the door." Then the thought comes flying back to me. Why should a man open a door for a woman? Is she not physically capable of performing such a basic task? Do not try to justify gender equality when a female can't stand to open a door. Don't be all poo-poo and sad. If you want gender equality, quit crying about all the 'gentleman' thingies I'm supposed to do. Don't YOU want to be a gentlewoman?
If you're all for destroying old gender roles, why should a guy always ask a girl out? If you're all about female empowerment, why are you so scared of risk you sit there and pray the guy will approach you? There's something pretty hypocritical about this if you ask me.
Sure, you should do things because it's a nice thing to do. But she was closer to the door. Standing at the door and asking me to open the door because I'm a guy is pretty sexist.
I'm not 100% into the whole super duper Feminist movement thing. Granted, females deserve the same opportunities men have. But what I'm starting to find out is that all the bickering about men making more is in fact, women wanting to work less hours to go home and take care of the kids. So you're fighting all these years to be out, pushing all these reforms for women in the workplace, then you're sort of killing the point by running back home to take care of Timmy the Baby. I understand, progress has been made, not all females are like this. I just don't see why a small group of ladies decide to say they are the victim of everything, that they are getting discriminated left and right. Darling, you work in the tech industry, and you'll become the baby everyone loves.
Before I get hate mail, I'm not saying all girls are babies that can't open doors. I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying, a small group of females are like this. I'm also saying, it irks me that in this day and age women expect men to be gentlemen and open doors and ask them out. Whaaaaaat?
Is it just me, or is forced circumcision really just child abuse? Why do you have to mutilate what god gave you? If your son wants circumcision when they're 18, fuck, they can go pay for their OWN circumcision and have it done on THEIR time. But choosing for a baby whether to cut off sensitive tissue should be illegal. But NO. We're going to cut a chunk of skin off of your penis because we can and its what your parents did to you. No painkillers given to the baby; it's not safe to drug a newborn. SO YOU CUT IT AND CLIP IT OFF AND YANK IT OFF WHILE THE BABY IS BLEEDING OUT THE GODDAMN PENIS.
"Circumcision. If I'm talking about female circumcision in the Western world, I'll rightly be met with gasps of horror. How could people think about cutting off the clitoris and labia of a healthy girl? If I'm talking about male circumcision, people react far more calmly, as if they're being offered full milk or half and half, as if the difference were purely cosmetic. "For some reason if you clip off a female's clitoris, it's quite illegal, but if you clip off the skin of a guy's penis, it's pretty damned acceptable.
No, a baby won't rememer isn't an excuse. Because first, they do, for quite a while. This has been documented. The penis is sensitive. If you rip stuff off without painkillers, it will be traumatic. They get nightmares. Also, 'they won't remember' isn't an arguement. How about you cut a baby with knives, slap and kick them, because they won't remember? I'd like to think society has moved past this and can do common sense.Seriously now. Guys, how would you feel if I yank shit out of your penis? I know I'd be scared shitless.
If having a foreskin increases the chance of UTI (Mind you, males already have a very low chance vs females, and for males it really only occurs when the guy doesn't clean himself for a century), and we're all about preventing every FUCKING little thing, let's just do gastric bypass to every man, woman, and child to prevent heart problems!
Foreskin is not a privilege; it is a BIRTH RIGHT.
While it IS legal to harm your future child's penis and potential sexual enjoyment, it is not MORALLY acceptable to do so. Don't chuck in your religion bullshit, either. Just because Jews do it doesn't make it ok. You know what? Criminals have been killing people for a long time. That doesn't make killing ok. You know that the Jew culture also has people sucking blood from the male's penis, right? You can believe whatever you want; but once you start inflicting physical harm in the name of your religion, I draw the line there. And sucking blood from a penis is just disgusting. Did I just critisize their culture? You betcha'. Before you gasp in shock, you know what I'm saying makes sense. So don't judge me or label me. I'm not Hitler the 5th.
Circumcision means less work cleaning your body? WHAT? Bro. How about I cut off your head so you don't have to wash your hair? How about I cut off your boobs so there's less surface area to clean? If I can clean the rest of my body, I'm quite capable of cleaning foreskin, thank you very much.
Who even suggested circumcision? A gazillion years ago. But who came up with the idea that, oh, we're going to lump off part of the nerve endings of the penis and be all fucking righteous about it? How can you look yourself in the mirror each morning and agree with FORCED REMOVAL of BODY PARTS from a SEXUAL AREA on a HELPLESS BABY???
Some women argue that a circumcised penis looks better. 1) They're retards, go find a non-idiotic woman 2) Do they have like a... dried glans penis fettish? 3) If you're [b]THAT[/b] desperate to get girls, you've got problems. Americans just are not happy with the way they look. Get a boob job. Get a penis job. It's saddening. There's not a single major medical journal that recommends circumcision. It is a relic of the past, like religion, only much worse. Some people think that the foreskin is good because it can be used to treat burn victims. Well, here's what happens: 1) Most are thrown out 2) Used for cosmetic companies that can find alternative to foreskin 3) Used for burn victims without consent. But are we in a shortage of skin grafts? ........................No. We'll just peel it off dead people. Or pigs.
There is the function of the foreskin; it keeps the glans moist and lubricated. Without it, the glans becomes dried out, sort of like a rock. Rocks don't generate good vibrations, if you know what I mean. The rolling back and forth motion the foreskin provides is great... because that's the way nature intended it. [b]In fact, there are even condoms... "ripped for her pleasure" to simulate the foreskin, I got a better idea. Don't cut it off in the first place!!![/b] Oh yaeh, and the nerves in the foreskin are jammed packed; it's also folded, so it's longer than it looks. It retracts when aroused for more comfort. Without foreskin, masturbating as a guy would be more difficult. Which was the precise point in the 1800s; masturbation was seen as bad, and people tried to prevent that by vouching for circumcision. Oh yeah, and cutting off skin literally makes your penis shorter. Just saying.
I'd like to stress the fact that once you do circumcision, you can't really un-do it. If you don't do it, you can do it whenever you feel like. This time with enough anesthesia, preferably.
By the way, circumcision leaves ugly scars. I'd be slightly self concious in the bedroom if my penis has a gigantic brown V mark from being sliced up.
So I guess my question here is, why is this legal? Why is it not hailed as immoral? And, if YOU have a male baby, will you choose circumcision for your son?
If the first rule of medicine is to do no harm, I'm pretty sure circumcision is a harmful thing. I'm also pretty sure doctors want to do it because it's an extra procedure for more profits. Circumcision is fucking bad, and bad for fucking.
Progress of Circumcision
Circumcision must be done for god -> Masturbation is wrong so cut off the foreskin to decrease pleasure -> Circumcision suddenly prevents disease (debatable, but must be unanimously accepted to warrant mutilation; even then, there's this thing called a condom...) -> Circumcision must be done for conformity because all the other guys have it done. -> Some people in other countries see through the bullshit, and like the non-metric system, USA is left behind, religious, self-righteous, and more stupid than ever.
Closing statement: If you HEAR the SCREAMS of the babies getting their fused foreskin clipped off, you will never want to do that for your kid, even if it was beneficial. I've watched a live dissection of a dead human being. This is just as bad. (Only the baby is alive and innocent, making this seem much more wrong.)
Jesus facepalm.
---
Reader comments:
"Oh god, you're not even good at this. It's natural looking, idiot. LOL That's like if everyone were cute off their pinky toes (They are useless) and we all got used to having 4 toes and then decided that 5 toes was "Weird" and "Ugly" It's fucking stupid and anyone with a working brain would know that. Circumcision is stupid and causes reduced sensitivity. And your new "Smoothness" reduces pleasure for the female as well. Meaning that If I fucked your girl, she'd enjoy it more. That's a fact."
"LOL. OK, all the things you mentioned are none beneficial. Having a PROTECTIVE BARRIER around the head of your dick, which provides more pleasure for both you AND your partner, is very, very beneficial. Keep supporting the reduction of sexual pleasure (Not to mention free will to choose whether you want it or not) for aesthetics. Go clean my smegma? LMAO! Yeah, god forbid I have to shower for 15 seconds longer than you, SO MUCH TIME WASTED! I could spend that time time NOT fully enjoying sex!"
Nathan: yeah i know, im just saying it does have 'some' purpose, even if so small. kind of like if parents did some procedure to cut off a part of your head, forcing you to be bald for life. little less to clean but still lol
"I myself could never convince myself to attend such a barbaric ceremony (which is hard living in Israel when every infant has it), and everywhere I just saw blood...in my mind....walls with blood...couldn't get in 100 meter radius to such places. Everybody is celebrating blood, pain and mutilation."
You guys are not NAIVE enough to think circumcision is a quick "cut and fix", right? Because it isn't quick, painless, bloodless, nor a fix. You're not stupid enough to make assumptions like this, right? Good, because I CBA to defriend people.
"Also "regular non-extremic" Jewdaism of "male circumcision" is more powerful in Europe/USA that extremic Islam of female circumcision.Also we as a modern culture were tought to care only for female sexual pleasure/orgasm, and care less about male one, as "male will have such anyway".
If that's true, that's again, quite sad. There are so many double standards for males and females. People people try to victimize females, saying they have all the shit coming while being a man is so easy. Since orgasms are the best feeling in the world and we are designed to want them over almost anything else;
(Our brain partly shuts off during it; a test of rats showed they'd rather get stimulation than fufil basic needs (eating, drinking water), so they end up dying);
I find it EXTREMELY cruel and unusual to deprive one of that in any way shape or form, or diminish the feeling.
I'm unique in that I'm not that attached to people. So if my parents did that to me, especially when I'm 12 and I already voiced my opinion on this matter, I would literally leave my home and pretend I don't know them. Because I refuse to be part of a family that allows mutilation, and I really don't give two fucks whether religion or any other reason for that matter, convinced them to do it. Something at their core isn't right. No excuses. There is always a choice and they made it. So. Fuck. Them.
"But that's in Israel....can't understand at all parents that do it in other countries. Those have really no reason to do so. Lack of health or any other benefits where proven long time ago, and the sexual, psychololical and ethical damage is clear. Though indeed it probably makes penis less sensitive and allows men to have the sexual act longer with more chances of pleasing a woman."
Hell yeah. I don't really hear people making fun of uncircumcised penises in USA. There is the idea that making the penis less sensitive allows men to please the woman better;Not saying I'm an expert in this field since I'm still a virgin and I plan to be until the right one comes along;
But there are more ways to please a woman than using your penis. Females very rarely get a vaginal orgasm, anyways, it's all clitoral stimulation. Because, let's be honest: women are capable of experiencing more pleasure than a male in the bedroom, and it's not like extra foreskin = instant-cum and an unsatisfied partner.
But as a guy all you have is the prostate and the penis. And for most, just the penis. And I would go insane if that is diminished.
IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT.
LEAVE (OUR) COLLECTIVE PENISES ALONE PLEASE. THANK YOU.
Males are required to sign up for selective service in case of a draft, but females are not? What kind of sexist crap is this? Females want gender equality? This is a good place to start. It's ok to make fun of a man on TV about his weight. Do that for a girl and IT'S ON! Girls can hit on guys on the news, but if a guy does that, he bet his ass he'll get sued for sexual harassment. Sure, there has not been a draft in a long while; but if there is one later, don't be complaining at home about how unfair life is when the guys are out there, dead. I'm not saying men have it harder than women. I'm just saying, for the few of you out there STILL complaining, life isn't ponies and rainbows for the rest of us. Let's just call it 50-50 for this one, ok?
